Thread:Rubnhsa/@comment-44405128-20200626141228/@comment-44405128-20200627132833

I'll put a reflection here as well:

I understand that said user is just trying to be helpful, but they aren't being helpful in any good way. Yes, looking back on this, perhaps a warning would have been enough to get my point across. I don't deny that if it is brought up. I have had instances of this user not listening to me, so that's how I justified the block. Weather that was a good or bad ruling is up to others.

On Wikipedia, there is a policy about assuming good faith, but there are also policies about not making pages with random stuff that near nobody actually cares about. There are policies about not making the page in a. There are loads more things like that. They don't help the wiki, even if they aren't intended to be bad.

Before you make an article that only has one or two sentences without an infobox, ask yourself: Could somebody expand on this topic? If not, it's probably not worth having a page for it.